Ψ£ΩΨΩΩΩΨ§ ΩΩΩΩΨͺΩΩ Ψ¨Ψ§ΩΩΨͺΨ±Ψ ΨͺΩΨ±Ψ¨ΩΨ§ Ω Ω Ψ±Ψ¨ΩΩΩΩ ΩΩΩ Ψ§ΩΩΨ±ΩΨ¨ Ψ§ΩΩ Ψ¬ΩΨ¨Ψ ΩΨ³Ω ΨΉΩ Ψ―Ψ¨ΩΨ¨ Ψ§ΩΩΩ ΩΨ© Ψ§ΩΨ³ΩΨ―Ψ§Ψ‘ ΩΩ Ψ§ΩΩΩΩΨ©Ω Ψ§ΩΨΈΩΩ Ψ§Ψ‘ ..
BY ππππ π πππππππ π€πΩ ΩΩΨ¬ΩΩΰ’ͺΩΩΨ― Ψ΄ΩΩΨΉΩΩΰ’ͺ π€π
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
ππππ π πππππππ Ω ΩΩΨ¬ΩΩΰ’ͺΩΩΨ― Ψ΄ΩΩΨΉΩΩΰ’ͺ from id